The idea is simple.

We educate drivers but what about fellow passengers. Are they suppose to know how to behave instinctively?

Thats why. To make traffic more secure I wonder if we could just educate fellow passengers. Perhaps an online course might be sufficient.

For example. Could it pose a danger playing on the phone while sitting in the front passenger place.

Efficiency is probably a smart network concept not a simple equation. As such its probably not isolated from other atomic networks.

I wonder. Could generated heat have additional functions for making the networks in the universe working? I mean why is there a thing like efficiency. Maybe the energy ”lost” as heat is doing a special kind of work.

In computer algorithms random numbers could be used for generating parameter values. Like in machine learning networks.

Then if you can reduce the need for parameter determination in ions and electrons. I guess you would reduce the amount of generated heat.

Parameter determination I speculate is the import work done by heat ”loss”. Actually I believe heat ”loss” is very important function.

So the idea is simple yet hard. Consider a large area around the active objects. Draw a large circle around every object in the battery. The suspicion is that everything in that area of interest is a concern to the parameter determination. So the idea is that there could exist direct or indirect exchange between electrons or between ions. If then some ions encountered obstacles that required lengthy parameter determination then this would be a concern to the other ions in its vicinity.

So to reduce heat ”loss” I wonder if you could check every nm of the battery to see if the ions would have to learn some hard obstacle. It could be that there exists small areas or edges with trouble sum parts that then affects the whole network system.

I was wondering. Was watching American Restoration when I got this idea. What if you could present a 3D render of possible restorations of objects to the customer.

I mean. This should make the sell easier. And perhaps more amazing restorations can be made.

With newer versions of Blender. A open source 3D creation software. The results are very realistic and fast.

So the idea is team up these shops with 3D artists.

If electrons are also networks then they to have network functionality. Then I wonder if there exist something like trained atomic objects like electrons or ions.

So the idea is to use electrons full efficiency capacity. Electrons subjected to obstacles should then have prior obstacle training. Electrons that need to ?cooperate should then have this kind of training.

So maybe the electric car could have groups of different electrons working in areas of their previous training. So you classify the path into groups. From inside the parts of battery to the parts of the motor. Where different trained electron abilities are needed.

Then I got some inspiration from Blender. An open source 3D rendering program. I speculated before that noise could be a factor in the performance of machine learning. So in blender I saw that they used noise reduction for every function. Here I wonder if the same could be done with the electric car battery system.

What I speculate is. If you noise reduce the output functions of a physical object like the ion or electron. This might show defined filtered solutions resembling differential equation solutions but perhaps more complex. Like biological evolution could have been some basic filter of random.

I was wondering. I think we need to innovate the peace process. So I thought why not create additional processes that are also associated with peace.

Inspired by faith processes. The idea is then to create a Hope Process a Love Process and perhaps joy and happiness processes or projects.

Maybe its not so hard. Maybe we need large joy and happiness projects around the globe. To prevent wars and make peace permanent.

Using my previous speculation

The general answer to the physics question why. For everything is that. What ever it is. It could make sense to a network.

Then my guess is that the physics phenomenon effects like the photoelectric effect makes sense if you view the atom as some kind of machine learning network.

So what can happen in a network? Well certainly problems can exist here also. One such problem is bad scaling. Too high values of some input.

Here I speculate that different atom networks have different sensitivity to value overflow on certain inputs. Then I guess it could handle this by diverting energy to more or different functions.

With this I predict there is a photokinetic effect. Perhaps the emdrive is such a device with a changed sensitivity due to construction choices.

I was wondering. What coordinate system could exist for objects like the atom?

I don’t know but I guess that it might be that a distance measurement is to imprecise.

If we say the electron is positioned around the atom. This might sound vague. But I wonder if there then exist a number of things that are then understood.

It could mean that its understood that the electron should be available for action. Then this might make the position more precise.

So you have a coordinate system that enables quick functionality. The position should be so that all the functions of the atom are quickly achieved.

It is all these criteria that then I guess determines the position of the electron.

My assumption is that a machine learning network is capable of taking advantage every input thrown at it.

So with a universe of networks I wonder. Could this mean that the universe takes advantage of things not so obvious. Like the in between space objects the atoms create in a material.

So if atoms have properties. Could empty space objects with a somewhat defined border also have properties?

Are there more not so thought of objects?

It could be that the object have important information properties. Like the border of an object is a object you can take information from. That is. Statistics about the border. Something similiar you do in machine learning where you might take the avarage smoothed border curve as input.

If rules are a subset of networks. Then could there exist interesting points and objects that are not defined by simple rules but instead of networks.

One such point could be to use a machine learning network to recognize the start point of a drawing.

I was thinking. Maybe there are some advantages of heat patterns in wood as there are in the sun.

So the idea is simple.

Simulate a light and heat pattern on the stove. See if performance can be improved.

Be sure to check the video.

I believe the fidget spinner is an important invention. Perhaps more so than could have been imagined from the start.

Im not sure I was surprised to read that the inventor have not earned a penny yet.

I wonder. What can be done. Perhaps its not possible to prevent things like this from happening in the future. But that does not mean things cant be corrected.

So is there a way to show support to inventors like Catherine Hettinger? http://classicspinner.com/

I wonder if its possible to make a moving part device static by changing the properties of objects or materials.

If the material have different functions that could be activated. It should reduce the mechanical complexity I think.

Like a mechanical clock to a digital watch.

A bold assumption is that everything can be made static. But the inspiration could come from mechanical solutions.

Meaning that we probably need to develop moving parts versions of our devices.

It should make things easier to find a programming language for non moving parts inventions if we know their could exist a mechanical blueprint.

In my opinion. Those who setup rules for inventions have not understood. Like in fusion or battery development. Setting up simple rules that everybody needs to follow just will just result in incremental progress.

We need groundbreaking inventions. One way to figure out those is to look a the man made ”rules” of the innovative process.

Here you just set generate new questions to the rules. Questions are like finding errors in the rule assumption.

So for a battery. A non moving part battery is more safe and can be placed in a phone. But that does not mean its the best for a car. I mean the car is big enough for a moving part car engine. So why not a moving part battery.

So the aim of a groundbreaking invention is probably to invent a ”moving parts battery machine” for vehicles.

One way to get more functionality is to use networks. Networks inspired by neural object networks in machine learning.

From this I wonder if there exist different light which has network possibilities.

So could something like a magnetic field be different light who then works in a network. It would need to be a network to achieve more complex functions or appearance. I think.

Just an inspiration idea.

The idea here is to move the ion readers, the spheres to the ions. The ions are then located on the inside of the cylinder.

Something like that. Reuse of momentum and mass that are in motion.

I wonder. Could a singularity point in the universe. Be defined as a point where no object from the universe can exist in.

If so then thinking big. Could there exist a large singularity outside the universe. Where nothing can or does exist.

As a way to initiate an invention you can start by coming up with names for the battery.

So here I guessed that maybe there should exist.

An Ion Acceleration Battery

Maybe acceleration is not the only parameter. Perhaps its possible to take advantage of mass and magnetism.

So maybe there should exist an ion shell and core object with a magnetic core for acceleration and a charged shell?

Even if you have to provide a little input energy to the battery ion transport. I wonder if it could be worth it. I mean a zero ion velocity would mean zero efficiency. So maybe you could get higher efficiency with increasing velocity.

Here I guess that maybe the battery could be unrolled into a Tape Battery. Increasing tape width will increase number of ions per minute at some speed. Maybe this is not enough but its a start of a battery machine.

If you know the answer to the question why can you calculate the how?

I think its possible. If you think about. It could work like a filter for random. So make a guess calculation. Look back and check to see if it makes sense to the physics network. Iterate until it all make sense. A bit crude algorithm though.

One thing that has to be learned from prior observable data is the network assessment of what makes sense. A bit like in machine learning.

Inspired by the motion machines I wonder if there exist “Spinner Compressor”. That is. A compressor in some sort of fidget spinner configuration.

If perpetual motion machines is redefined as machines that last a little longer than what is expected to us. Then I think it has some resemblance to fidget spinners.

So why not should there not exist a ”smart axle”. One that performs a little better than expected to us. Inspired by spinners or long lasting motion machines.

Smart Axle – With Built in bearings

By association there should exist some connection between gravity and quantum teleportation. As they I assume can both act on any in between distances.

I speculated that light could reveal information about the starting values of the atom(networks). The atom network is just everything that happens within an atom.

I wonder therefor. What other possibilities does a network have?

Since a network can recognize things it can also generate things. Then is it possible the atom(network) can generate a force and its direction.

The information for this generation should then come from the collaboration from named association. The ?quantum world.

A strategy to build up resilience against depression is as easy as physical workout. If your heart can stand it I really recommend this.

The depression industry is big but ?misguided. I think its time some experience got involved.

One possibility with a network is that it could handle all input at the same time. I guess it could even handle apparent random input.

So from this I conclude that input could come from within. From empty space within the atom(network) as well as from the outside.

Since I came up with the network idea in physics. Internal atom networks that could perhaps explain everything.

I wonder. Could there exist smart gravity. A network solution to recognized gravity laws we experience.

I mean if the universe can pin point particles in spooky action at a distance anywhere in the universe. Why should the task of directing a gravitational force be more difficult.

Why should gravity be something derived by simple rules. So my idea is that gravity is actually a smart network version of a force. A network calculating its direction and strength.