If Hot Water Freeze Faster Than Cold. Do Pretreated Air Also Cool Faster?
The reason for this effect I believe is optimization for life. The fluid will ?try to get an acceptable mean temperature. By cooling fast the mean will be lower if then the temperature sky rockets again.
Thinking about three-body problems. Since we got earth, the moon and the sun as a three-body problem. I wonder.
Is the three-body problem physics-information important? Is it used as a feature in the universe?
“Unlike two-body problems, there is no general closed-form solution for every condition, and numerical methods are needed to solve these problems.”-wikipedia
Could this mean that the problem is close to non exact? Could this mean there is room for decisions making network for positions and velocity. I mean could the network choose.
Not familiar with the uncertainty principle but it is ?solved by letting a network choose. Kinda the same thing here. Could I guess be similar to my decision numbers. The problem of dividing an odd number into two. Where you have to choose which pile to get one more.
Since networks can handle difficult tasks. Networks are probably used everywhere in the universe. Field lines could with a little imagination look like a part of a network.
Therefor I wonder. Why do we have field lines? What sense do they make to a network. If they are used for information. Then a memory is needed. Then what type of memory?
From our own computer innovations we got different memory chips and speeds. Therefor I guess that an atom with its electric field needs fast information to keep itself in shape. Information is what was missing in physics equations.
Where as a gravitational field. There is more time for atom decision making. So a slower information update.
So maybe the force could be responsible for the acceleration of information ( the little mass ). With this I get a strong force where information might need to be updated quickly.
Since sand is made for digging. A probable universe invention would be sand shapes. So I imagine water in the desert would optimize its ground shape and sides. To prevent too much evaporation. To support life.
Looking at pictures of desert lakes. Pretty much everything I see I think are optimized but also perhaps it can take advantage of gravity from the water network.
Since networks can be build by mass and mass is the building blocks of the universe. I wonder. Do all laws containing mass also contain a network?
Then why not include the network in the equations. Gravity for example then ?becomes a more detailed law.
From this I guess that ?antimatter ?being another type of network would not interact gravitationally with matter. ?Since of annihilation. It would not be optimized for life. The gravitation result solution from a network ?can I guess be what is most suitable.
How would antimatter and matter ever separated in a safe way?
Why does a root system look like the way it does? What other functions does it have other than getting water from the soil?
Since a tree could withstand high winds. I wonder. Could the root system also handle stability. Does it sense gravity?
Whenever there many functions to handle I assume a network. Since complex ability is what networks are for. Therefor I guess the root system is a physical water network.
The philosophical interesting part is that water in tree roots. Are water separated. That is. Separated water is not a ?common configuration. So inventions based on that should not be in the set of probable inventions.
Another water network would be water between rocks.
If everything is smart. So should light also be smart.
This make me guess that light propagation is a cluster of randomly located photons. Why. Since it make sense to a network. That is. At near impact the light can make a decision from a formed interconnected network.
The decision could be to optimize the problem for better chances of for life.
So why not see if there is some use for random points around a first batch of random points.
That is. Use the first points as center for another 10 random points with some ?narrow radius.
Could this be a little smarter than using the whole grid as possible values for all the random points.
I got this idea after wondering how water can optimize for life from water droplets hitting the surface as random() input. I mean when its starts raining then the water knows it can support life elsewhere.
A was looking at pea food commercial. When they showed the land. It looked kind of dry. So even if they find a good future plant. They need water assistant technology of some kind. Perhaps desalination.
So to ensure future harvests. I think food producers need to invest in desalination and water technology.
We should follow Israel and other countries. I’m thinking adapting for an arid,desert like environment. With the technology we develop for this environment we can use it for circumstances that might develop in the future.
I was thinking. Who is the best runner. A man with strong legs or a man with long thinner legs? The answer might be the third option. A man with strong legs but oddly very light weight.
So the idea is to see if a strong large motor could be made very light weight. Not only the moving parts but all the parts. Since all parts of the motor experience vibration and acceleration in the vehicle direction.
Here is my machine learning physics electric circuit idea.
If F.relu() is a diode then what is the electric circuit equivalent of F.sigmoid()? Is there probability and classifications in an electric circuit also?
Then if moving a machine learning classification results could mimics some sort of gravity function? Since I suspect there two options. Either you move mass together or energy between them in a problem of potential.
So mass as a movable potential?